Captain Plan→it

About

Innovation, inspiration, ideas, stories and knowledge from cities around the world.


lifeonfoot:

Objections are often raised that new narrow streets are impossible under today’s regulatory regime of fire codes and inflexible functional classification schemes, but examples such as these seem to disprove that notion.  The paved area plus flanking concrete drainage channels is 20 feet wide, conforming with the right-of-way requirements of the International Fire Code and the National Fire Protection Association.

I just got back from London and I was surprised at how well narrow one way streets worked for traffic (it helps that there is so little of it anyway.) Here in Columbus everyone is trying to kill all one ways as fast as possible, but now I’m thinking that might not be necessary.

23 notes

\This was posted 11 months ago
1This was reblogged from lifeonfoot
  1. mattjamesrogers reblogged this from lifeonfoot
  2. bro-would-you-be-mad-if-i reblogged this from maraduous
  3. maraduous reblogged this from captainplanit
  4. captainplanit reblogged this from lifeonfoot and added:
    I just got back from London and I was surprised at how well narrow one way streets worked for traffic (it helps that...
  5. justkamalam reblogged this from lifeonfoot
  6. reagancassidy reblogged this from nickoftimela
  7. stevevance said: The street I live on is about 26 ft wide curb-curb. Subtract 14 ft for the parked cars on both sides and you have a 12 ft wide. That’s same width of a highway lane but it feels narrower on my street because of the constant presence of parked cars.
  8. adhocratic reblogged this from lifeonfoot
  9. whatturnsmywheels reblogged this from lifeonfoot and added:
    Yes, please.
  10. nickoftimela reblogged this from lifeonfoot
  11. lifeonfoot posted this

Facebook comments